What is Econometrics
Introduction
1.1   What is Econometrics?
The  term  “econometrics” is believed  to  have
 been  crafted  by  Ragnar  Frisch  (1895-1973)
 of
Norway, one of the three principle founders
of the Econometric Society, …rst editor of the journal Econometrica, and
 co-winner  of the
 …rst
 Nobel Memorial
 Prize
 in Economic
Sciences in 1969.  It is therefore
…tting that we turn to Frisch’s own words in the introduction
to the …rst issue of Econometrica for an explanation of the discipline.
A word of explanation regarding
 the term  econometrics  may be in order.  Its
de…ni- tion is implied in the statement of the scope of the [Econometric]
 Society, in Section
I of the Constitution, which reads:
 “The
 Econometric Society is an international society
for the advancement of economic theory  in its relation  to statistics and mathematics.... Its main object shall be to promote studies that aim at a uni…cation of the theoretical- quantitative and the empirical-quantitative approach to economic
problems....”
But there are several aspects of the quantitative approach to economics, and no single one
of these aspects, taken by itself, should be confounded with econometrics.  Thus, econometrics  is by no means
 the
 same as economic statistics.
 Nor is it identical
 with what
we call general economic
theory,  although
 a considerable portion  of this theory
has a de…ninitely quantitative character. Nor should econometrics  be taken  as synonomous with  the  application of mathematics to  economics.   Experience
 has
 shown  that each
of these  three
 view-points,
 that of statistics, economic  theory,   and  mathematics, is
a necessary, but not by itself a su¢cient, condition for a real understanding of the quantitative relations in modern economic life. 
It is the uni…cation of all three that is powerful.  And it is this uni…cation that constitutes econometrics.
Ragnar
 Frisch,
 Econometrica, (1933), 1, pp.
 1-2.
This de…nition remains valid today, although
some terms have evolved
somewhat in their usage. Today,
 we would  say
 that econometrics
 is the  uni…ed  study
 of economic  models,
 mathematical statistics, and economic
data.
Within  the …eld of econometrics there are sub-divisions and specializations. Econometric theory concerns
 the
 development
 of tools and  methods,
 and
 the
 study
 of the  properties
 of econometric
methods.    Applied  econometrics  is a term
 describing
 the
 development
 of quantitative
 economic
models and the application of
econometric  methods
 to these models using economic
data.
1.2   The Probability Approach to Econometrics
The unifying
methodology  of modern econometrics  was articulated by Trygve Haavelmo (1911-
1999) of Norway,
 winner
 of the  1989
Nobel Memorial  Prize  in Economic
 Sciences, in his seminal
1
paper “The probability approach in econometrics”, Econometrica (1944).  Haavelmo argued that quantitative economic models  must
 necessarily
 be probability
 models  (by
 which  today  we would mean  stochastic).  Deterministic models are blatently inconsistent
 with
 observed  economic quan- tities,  and
 it
 is incoherent
 to
 apply
 deterministic models  to  non-deterministic data.    Economic
models should  be explicitly  designed  to  incorporate randomness; stochastic errors
 should
 not
 be simply added  to deterministic models to make them
 random.   Once
we acknowledge
that
an eco- nomic model is a probability model, it follows naturally
that an appropriate tool way to quantify,
estimate, and  conduct  inferences  about  the  economy
 is through  the  powerful  theory  of mathe- matical statistics.  The
appropriate method for a quantitative economic analysis follows from the probabilistic construction of the economic model.
Haavelmo’s probability approach
was quickly embraced by the economics profession. Today no quantitative work in economics
shuns its fundamental vision.
While all economists embrace the probability
approach, there has been some evolution in its implementation.
The structural approach is the closest to Haavelmo’s original
idea.  A probabilistic economic model is speci…ed, and the quantitative analysis performed under the assumption that
the economic model
is correctly speci…ed. Researchers often describe
this as “taking their model seriously.” The structural approach
typically leads to likelihood-based analysis,
including maximum likelihood and Bayesian  estimation.
A  criticism  of the  structural
 approach is that it  is misleading  to  treat an  economic  model as correctly
speci…ed.   Rather, it is more accurate
to view a model as a useful abstraction or approximation. In
this case, how should we interpret
structural econometric analysis? The quasi- structural approach
to inference views a structural economic model as an approximation
rather than  the truth. This theory  has led to the concepts  of the pseudo-true value (the
 parameter value de…ned by the estimation
problem), the quasi-likelihood function, quasi-MLE,
and quasi-likelihood inference.
Closely related is the semiparametric approach. A probabilistic
economic model is partially
speci…ed but some features are left unspeci…ed.
 This approach typically
leads to estimation methods such as least-squares and the Generalized Method of Moments.  
The semiparametric approach dominates  contemporary econometrics,
 and is the main focus of this textbook.
Another  branch  of quantitative structural economics is the  calibration approach.  Similar to the quasi-structural approach, the
calibration approach interprets structural models as approx-
imations and hence inherently false.   The di¤erence is that the calibrationist literature rejects mathematical statistics as inappropriate for approximate
models,  and  instead
 selects parameters
by matching  model and data  moments
 using non-statistical ad
hoc1  methods.
1.3   Econometric Terms and Notation
In a typical application, an econometrician has a set of repeated measurements
on a set of vari- ables. For example,
in a labor application
the variables could include
weekly earnings, educational attainment, age, and other descriptive  characteristics. We call this information  the data, dataset, or sample.
We use the term observations to
refer to the distinct repeated  measurements on the variables. An individual observation often corresponds to a speci…c economic
unit, such as a person, household,
corporation, …rm, organization, country, state, city or other geographical region.  An individual observation could  also be a measurement  at  a point  in time,
 such  as quarterly GDP
 or a daily interest
rate.

Economists typically denote variables by the italicized roman characters y, x; and/or z: The convention  in econometrics
 is to use the 
character y to denote
 the  variable
 to be explained,  while
1 Ad hoc means  “for this purpose”
 – a method designed for a speci…c problem  – and
 not based  on a generalizable principle.
the characters x
and z are used to denote
 the conditioning  (explaining)  variables.
Following mathematical convention,  real numbers
 (elements  of the real line R) are written using lower case italics such as y, and vectors (elements
 of Rk ) by lower case bold italics such as x; e.g.
  0 x1   1
x = B x2   C 
B     C      
   xk    
Upper case bold italics
such as X are used for matrices.
We typically  denote  the  number  of observations by the  natural number
 n; and  subscript  the variables  by the index i to denote
 the individual  observation, e.g.  yi; xi  and zi. In some contexts we use indices other  than  i, such as in time-series
 applications where the 
index t is common,  and in panel studies
 we typically use the double index it to refer to individual  i at a time period t.
The i’th observation
is the set (yi; xi; zi):
It is proper  mathematical practice  to use upper  case
X  for random
 variables  and
lower case x for realizations
 or speci…c values.
 This practice  is not commonly followed in econometrics
 because instead  we use upper  case
to denote  matrices.   Thus
 the  notation yi will in some places
refer to a random
 variable,  and in other  places
a speci…c realization. Hopefully there
 will be no confusion as the use should be evident from the context.
We typically use Greek letters
 such as   ;   and    2  to denote  unknown
 parameters of an econo-
metric  model,
 and
 will use boldface,  e.g. 
    or    , when
 these
 are
 vector-valued.
 Estimates are
typically denoted  by putting a hat  “^”, tilde  “~”  or bar
 “-” over the  corresponding
 letter,
 e.g.
  ^
and  ~ are estimates  of   :
The
 covariance
 matrix
 of an econometric
 estimator will typically be written using the  capital

boldface V ; often
with  a subscript
 to denote  the  estimator, e.g.  V  b
= var   pn
 b     
      as the

covariance  matrix
 for pn
 b     
    : Hopefully without causing confusion, we will use the notation

V   =
avar( b ) to  denote  the  asymptotic covariance
 matrix
 of pn
 b     
    (the  variance  of the
asymptotic distribution).
 Estimates will be denoted  by appending
 hats
 or tildes,  e.g. estimate Vb    is an of V   .
Tags: ECONOMETRICS
 
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)









Share your views...
0 Respones to "What is Econometrics"
Post a Comment